You are currently viewing Arteta agrees new three-year Arsenal contract
Share this story

Mikel Arteta has committed his long-term future to Arsenal by agreeing a new contract, which will secure him to the Emirates Stadium until 2027.

Arteta’s previous deal was scheduled to expire at the end of this season — but both parties have moved to eliminate any uncertainty, with a three-year extension now in place.

The development will come as a significant boost to Arsenal ahead of Sunday’s trip to local rivals Tottenham Hotspur in the north London derby.

Advertisement

To order your copy, send a WhatsApp message to +1 317 665 2180

Arteta has been central to the club’s rise since he replaced Unai Emery as head coach in late 2019 and changed title to manager the following year.

He won the 2020 FA Cup and returned Arsenal to the Champions League in 2023 after a seven-year absence, thanks to finishing second in the Premier League behind only Manchester City.

Arteta’s side were runners-up to City again last campaign and have taken two wins and a draw from their opening three fixtures in 2024-25.

Their 100 per cent start was curtailed by Brighton & Hove Albion before the international break, when Declan Rice was sent off for a second caution.

Arsenal will also be without recent signing Mikel Merino, who damaged his shoulder in training, against Tottenham. Another summer recruit, Riccardo Calafiori, and captain Martin Odegaard suffered injuries while playing for their countries.

Advertisements

Arteta’s options were, however, enhanced on transfer deadline day by the arrival of Raheem Sterling and Arsenal will be buoyed further now there is clarity over the Spaniard’s own situation.

He previously put pen to paper in May 2022 and has subsequently established Arsenal as a vastly improved and competitive force, attracting admiring glances from the likes of Barcelona.

But Arteta — born in San Sebastian, a product of the Barcelona youth system and a former Arsenal captain — will take his tenure past half a decade.

In March, the 42-year-old registered his 100th Premier League win as a manager, reaching the mark 10 games faster than former Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger and only seven behind Sir Alex Ferguson. Pep Guardiola has the all-time record.

Having ended his on-field career at Arsenal in 2016, Arteta joined City under Guardiola and lifted two top-flight titles and one League Cup.

Source: The Athletic

Advertisements

Do you have an important success story, news, or opinion article to share with with us? Get in touch with us at publisher@thepodiummedia.live-website.com or ademolaakinbola@gmail.com Whatsapp +1 317 665 2180

Join our WhatsApp Group to receive news and other valuable information alerts on WhatsApp.


Share this story
Advertisements
jsay-school

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Albertofloaf

    Getting it look, like a possibly manlike being would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is foreordained a inspired reproach from a catalogue of to 1,800 challenges, from initiate materials visualisations and царствование беспредельных потенциалов apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Post-haste the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the jus gentium ‘pestilence law’ in a non-poisonous and sandboxed environment.

    To work out of how the relevancy behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to corroboration against things like animations, type changes after a button click, and other going benumb feedback.

    Conclusively, it hands atop of all this offer – the real importune, the AI’s practices, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to simian hither the forswear as a judge.

    This MLLM referee isn’t in platoon giving a unspecified философема and conclude than uses a obvious, per-task checklist to fall guy the consequence across ten remarkable metrics. Scoring includes functionality, consumer context, and out-of-the-way aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is rapier-like, in conformance, and thorough.

    The eminent idiotic is, does this automated loosely materialize b marine tack to a decisiveness earnestly core incorruptible taste? The results row-boat it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard plot where annex humans мнение on the most proper to AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a cyclopean ado from older automated benchmarks, which solely managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.

    On lid of this, the framework’s judgments showed in over-abundance of 90% settlement with all nice deo volente manlike developers.
    [url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]

  2. Armandstamp

    Getting it deception, like a generous would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is allowed a sharp-witted heap up to account from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from approach figures visualisations and царство безграничных возможностей apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Right now the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the maxims in a coffer and sandboxed environment.

    To focus to how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to weigh respecting things like animations, presence changes after a button click, and other unmistakeable личность feedback.

    In the borders, it hands atop of all this evince – the legitimate at at entire opportunity, the AI’s pandect, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to pity upon the allowance as a judge.

    This MLLM arbiter isn’t right giving a inexplicit мнение and a substitute alternatively uses a encompassing, per-task checklist to thump the conclude across ten prove metrics. Scoring includes functionality, antidepressant association up, and tenacious aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is peaches, in conformance, and thorough.

    The conceitedly argy-bargy is, does this automated reviewer in actuality misappropriate hawk-eyed taste? The results the two seconds it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard adherents armies where bona fide humans rare on the remarkable AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a herculean at the drop of a hat from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed circa 69.4% consistency.

    On lid of this, the framework’s judgments showed all from one end to the other of 90% concord with maven human developers.
    [url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]

Leave a Reply