A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Maitama, Abuja, on Tuesday awarded N500,000 in costs against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for delaying the trial of former Central Bank of Nigeria governor, Godwin Emefiele.
The trial judge, Hamza Muazu, imposed the cost after the prosecution failed to produce its witness at the resumed hearing.
Justice Muazu, while granting what he described as a final adjournment, warned the prosecution to ensure the attendance of its witnesses at the next sitting.

Emefiele is standing trial on a 20-count amended charge marked FCT/HC/CR/577/2023, bordering on alleged criminal breach of trust, forgery, abuse of office, conspiracy, and obtaining money by false pretence.
He was, among others, accused of allegedly obtaining $6.23m under the guise of funding international election observers for the 2023 general election. He is also accused of conferring corrupt advantages on two firms—April 1616 Nigeria Ltd and Architekon Nigeria Ltd.
At the proceedings, prosecuting counsel, Abba Mohammed (SAN), told the court that the prosecution’s witness, a Deputy Commissioner of Police, Elohor Edwin Okpoziakeo, was absent despite being duly notified.
Mohammed explained that the witness was attending a separate matter at the Gwagwalada Division of the FCT High Court involving a personal case against a commercial bank, where a garnishee order had been placed on his account.
He further informed the court that steps had been taken to secure the witness’s attendance, including writing to the Inspector-General of Police through the Force Headquarters, following a directive issued on Monday.
The prosecutor subsequently applied for an adjournment to enable the witness to testify.
However, defence counsel, Matthew Burkaa (SAN), opposed the application, citing Sections 396(3) and (4) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, which limit parties in a criminal trial to five adjournments from arraignment to judgment.
Burkaa argued that the prosecution had already exceeded the statutory limit, having been granted about eight adjournments since the commencement of the trial.
He contended that the prosecution failed to properly manage its case, noting that the witness had been listed in the proof of evidence since January 2024 and that sufficient time had been available to secure his attendance.
The defence urged the court to refuse further adjournment.
In his ruling, Justice Muazu agreed that the provisions of the ACJA on adjournments were clear but held that the court retains discretionary powers to grant adjournments in the interest of justice.
He noted that the witness, being an investigator in the case, was a material witness who should not be shut out.
Relying on Section 396(6) of the ACJA, the judge awarded a cost of N500,000 against the prosecution for causing delay, despite the earlier grant of an accelerated hearing.
The matter was adjourned till April 27 and 28 for the continuation of the trial.
Stay ahead with the latest updates!
Join The Podium Media on WhatsApp for real-time news alerts, breaking stories, and exclusive content delivered straight to your phone. Don’t miss a headline — subscribe now!
Chat with Us on WhatsApp




