Former Ogun State governor, Ibikunle Amosun, recently responded to accusations from Professor Pat Utomi with a forceful rebuttal. Utomi had accused Amosun of cancelling a contract during his time as governor, claiming it was an unjust decision. However, Amosun did not take these allegations lightly, responding with a sharp counter that left many wondering about Utomi’s true intentions.
Amosun’s response was no mere denial; it was a detailed account that painted Utomi in a different light. He explained how the Ogun State House of Assembly had already declared Utomi persona non grata before he took office. This decision was based on Utomi’s questionable business practices, which Amosun had attempted to investigate upon becoming governor.
The former governor revealed that Utomi’s demands for compensation were far from reasonable. Despite being willing to offer a refund, Amosun refused to meet Utomi’s inflated claims, believing that the situation was an attempt to manipulate the state government. In Amosun’s eyes, Utomi’s actions were driven by a sense of entitlement rather than genuine grievances.
Advertisement
To order your copy, send a WhatsApp message to +1 317 665 2180
Amosun also touched on an incident where Utomi tried to influence him through an award, which he initially declined. Even after attending the event, Amosun stood firm on his decision not to yield to Utomi’s pressure. This interaction only deepened Amosun’s resolve, showing that he was not one to be swayed by superficial gestures.
The former governor made it clear that his decisions were based on fairness and accountability. He challenged anyone, including journalists, to examine the construction site in question and judge the validity of Utomi’s claims. For Amosun, this was a matter of principle, and he was determined to maintain his integrity.
As the dust settles on this exchange, one can’t help but wonder about the true motivations behind these public statements. Amosun and Utomi, once distant figures, now find themselves locked in a battle of words that leaves observers questioning who, if any, really holds the moral high ground.